Update 02-16-2022: Given my dissertation, my involvement with BYU Studies, and some other timely commitments, this manuscript is currently on pause at about 200 pages long. I have addressed many of the book topics in my public talks, podcasts, and this collection.
I am currently writing a book on Genesis 1, tentatively titled Reading Scripture, Reading Creation: The Ancient Near Eastern Context of Genesis 1. It grows out of personal interest, a perceived need among LDS, long study of Genesis, the ancient Near East, the history of science and religion, and LDS history and doctrine. Most directly, it comes from an experience teaching the UI-Urbana/Champagne Institute class (largely made up of PhD students in hard science), who had asked how I made sense of Genesis as a Latter-day Saint studying the ancient Near East. So I taught a course on Genesis, which I repeated a few years later in Manhattan, which eventually grew into a book proposal and contract.
While some people wonder how you can write an entire book on just one chapter, the number of topics I must include (for my conclusions to make sense) or want to include (useful, fun, interesting) is quite large. For example, the book touches on:
- the Israelite conception of the cosmos, their worldview and cosmology
- how and why Genesis differs from the uniquely LDS creation accounts of the Book of Moses, Book of Abraham, and the temple account
- why Genesis 1 differs both from a second creation account in Genesis 2-3 and sharply from a third creation tradition scattered elsewhere in the Bible
- the relationship between Genesis and science
- what Genesis 1 meant to Israelites
- who wrote Genesis 1 as we have it, when, and why
- what relation it has to other Near Eastern creation accounts such as the Babylonian Enuma Elish
- why that relationship with other ancient Near Eastern creation texts is crucial to understanding Genesis 1
- the relevance an ancient creation account has today
- reading scripture in context
- what we can reasonably expect from ancient scripture
- how inspiration can be “wrong” or even wrong (see here for a New Testament example)
Below is a summary and sample. Any of this may undergo major or minor changes as the work progresses, but here’s how it stands at the moment.
The book has several main sections.
- Necessary groundwork
- Looking at different creation accounts and related questions
- Setting Genesis 1 against its ancient Near Eastern background
- Translations and commentary
- Addendum and Excursis
Section 1- Groundwork
This section makes explicit assumptions, definitions, and methods. A few principles need to be clearly established regarding 1) revelation which comes to 2) prophets, which sometimes becomes 3) scripture which we must then understand through, 4) interpretation. These include
- the nature of scripture and revelation, including the principles of
- adaptation (i.e. revelation is not necessarily unique, and often draws on preexisting cultural elements, adapting and recontextualizing them to give new meaning)
- accommodation (i.e. divinity must condescend to work with humanity at the human level, communicating with them in ways they understand)
- responsivity (i.e. revelation rarely comes out of the blue, but is prompted by an issue, question, problem, situation, etc.)
- variation (i.e. inspired material takes a variety of forms: legal material, letters, poetry, parable, “biography”; it may be historical, semi-historical, or non-historical)
- the importance of context and different kinds of context
- the importance of recognizing genre and genre confusion
- different kinds of interpretation
Relevant past blog posts
- Encultured Prophets and the Firmament
- Beyond Translation Part 1: Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra
- Beyond Translation Part 2: Job and Isaiah at Ugarit?
- Jonah- The Insufficiency of the New Testament Argument
- The Scriptures: An Anthology. Or, Why Jonah and the Book of Mormon have Nothing to Do with Each Other
- Institute Report: Genesis Week 2
Section 2– Joseph Smith and the Double-Creation Problem
This section looks in depth at creation accounts in the Bible, the Book of Moses, the Book of Abraham, and the temple. Where did we get each one, what kind of thing is it, what is it trying to say, why don’t they all agree? How should we understand them? I frame these accounts within the general process of the Joseph Smith Translation.
I also presents a brief historical look at non-LDS and LDS interpretations of Genesis to establish that a variety of views have been held both throughout early Christianity and at the highest levels of the LDS Church.
Relevant past blog posts
Section 3- The Ancient Near Eastern Background of Genesis 1
This section contextualizes Genesis 1 as an ancient Near Eastern creation account like many others, primarily by commparing the Babylonian Enuma Elish. It focuses on the important points that become clear when Genesis is set against this background. This is broad commentary from the 30,000 ft level.
Relevant past blog posts
Section 4- Translation and Commentary
In this section, I provide three translations in parallel, along with detailed verse-by-verse commentary.
Here’s a sample of the three-column translation.
The KJV in the left column is there for comparison and familiarity, the other two are both mine. Neither has literary aesthetics as a primary goal.
The center column is a formal or “literal” translation, which hews closer to the Hebrew text in terms of rhythm, syntax, brevity, etc. but at the cost of smooth, clear English. Punctuation is minimal. This approach to translation is often referred to as a “word-for-word” even though such a thing doesn’t really exist. The italics represent transliteration of Hebrew words I’d prefer to explain instead of translate, and each has a section in the accompanying commentary. This gets you closer to feel and flavor of the Hebrew text. It’s a bit like the clear window over the engine of exotic cars; even if you don’t understand how all the pieces of the engine work, it’s still neat to be able to see under the hood.
The right column is a dynamic translation, which is more expansive and interpretive in trying to convey the meaning of the Hebrew into English. In contrast to “word-for-word” this is sometimes described as “thought-for-thought.” It borders on periphrastic at times.
Because you can see it from different perspectives, reading multiple translations together contributes greatly to understanding the original text.
My initial outline commentary on these three verses runs about four pages with footnotes. Most verses won’t require as much, but there’s a lot going on here.
KJV
1:1 In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.2 And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters. 3 And God said, Let there be light.
Formal translation
When ‘elohīm began creating the heavens and the earth
the landmass was wild and waste
darkness on the face of the Deep
ruaḥ of ‘elohīm raḥaph-ing upon the face of the waters
and ‘elohim said let there be light
Dynamic Translation
When God began creating everything (the earth being purposeless and nonfunctional, with darkness upon the Deep, and a divine wind hovering upon the water), God said, “Let there be a period of light!”
There are very few other usages of raḥaph and none in similar contexts. I’m not attached to “hovering” in the dynamic translation, but raḥaph is a very rare word, which makes it hard to pin down semantically. Thus my preference to transliterate and anglicize the participle as “raḥaph-ing” in the literal translation. Then, like so much else here, it gets an explanatory paragraph in the commentary. Nearly every word in these verses requires commentary. As I said, there’s a lot going on here.
Section 5- Addendums
These currently include a short guide to Hebrew and pronunciation, a glossary/abbreviations, a bibliography, and an index.
Here’s a sampling of major popular works from my research list. Beyond these, I have a broad variety of technical commentaries, monographs, and articles.
- John Day, God’s Conflict with the Dragon and the Sea: Echoes of a Canaanite Myth in the Old Testament
- Sarna, JPS Torah Commentary: Genesis
- Sarna, Understanding Genesis (The Heritage of Biblical Israel)
- Robert Alter, Genesis: Translation and Commentary
- John Walton, The NIV Application Commentary: Genesis
- Michael Fishbane, Biblical Interpretation in Ancient Israel
- Jon D. Levenson, Creation and the Persistence of Evil
- John Walton, The Lost World of Genesis One: Ancient Cosmology and the Origins Debate
- Gregory Moberly, The Return of the Chaos Monsters: and Other Backstories of the Bible
- David Bokovoy, Authoring the Old Testament: Genesis-Deuteronomy
- Mark S. Smith, The Priestly Vision of Genesis I
- Peter C. Bouteneff, Beginnings: Ancient Christian Readings of the Biblical Creation Narratives
- Barton and Wilkinson, eds. Reading Genesis after Darwin
- Jeffrey M. Bradshaw, In God’s Image and Likeness: Ancient and Modern Perspectives on the Book of Moses
- Peter Enns, Inspiration and Incarnation: Evangelicals and the Problem of the Old Testament
- Peter Enns, The Evolution of Adam: What the Bible Does and Doesn’t Say about Human Origins
- Peter Enns, Genesis for Normal People: A Guide to the Most Controversial, Misunderstood, and Abused Book of the Bible
- R.W. Moberly, The Theology of the Book of Genesis (Old Testament Theology)
- Richard E. Friedman,Who Wrote the Bible?
- Friedman’s follow-up, a translation with highlighted sources and commentary, The Bible with Sources Revealed
- Miller &Soden, In the Beginning… We Misunderstood: Interpreting Genesis 1 in Its Original Context
- Stephen Bridge, Getting the Old Testament: What It Meant to Them, What It Means for Us
- Avigdor Shinan, From Gods to God: How the Bible Debunked, Suppressed, or Changed Ancient Myths and Legends
- Leon Kass, The Beginning of Wisdom: Reading Genesis
- Brevard Childs, Myth and Reality in the Old Testament
- Halton, ed. Genesis: History, Fiction, or Neither?: Three Views on the Bible’s Earliest Chapters (Counterpoints: Bible and Theology)
- Ronald L. Numbers, Galileo Goes to Jail and Other Myths about Science and Religion
- Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger (i.e. the recent Pope), In the Beginning ’: A Catholic Understanding of the Story of Creation and the Fall (Ressourcement: Retrieval & Renewal in Catholic Thought)
- Everett Fox, The Five Books of Moses: Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, Deuteronomy (The Schocken Bible, Volume 1)
- Joel S. Baden, The Composition of the Pentateuch: Renewing the Documentary Hypothesis (The Anchor Yale Bible Reference Library)
- Gee & Hauglid, eds., Astronomy, Papyrus, and Covenant (Brigham Young University – Studies in the Book of Abraham)
- Phillip Barlow, Mormons and the Bible: The Place of the Latter-day Saints in American Religion (Religion in America)
- Coote & Ord, In the Beginning: Creation and the Priestly History
- Charles, ed. Reading Genesis 1-2: An Evangelical Conversation
- Seth Postell, Adam as Israel: Genesis 1-3 as the Introduction to the Torah and Tanakh
- Carlson & Longmann, Science, Creation and the Bible: Reconciling Rival Theories of Origins
- Kenton Sparks, God’s Word in Human Words: An Evangelical Appropriation of Critical Biblical Scholarship
- Mark S. Smith. How Human is God?: Seven Questions about God and Humanity in the Bible
October 28, 2019 at 11:59 am
I anxiously await you book–at last I will then be able to better understand Genesis, or at least take significant steps toward that end.
February 22, 2021 at 11:31 am
It sound like an interesting read when it is out
April 9, 2021 at 2:33 pm
Hi Ben. Just being introduced to your blog through Facebook and skimming the above. The treatment of “beginning” or “began” in your versions of Genesis 1:1 intrigue me. To what extent is your choice of “began” as opposed to “in the beginning” influenced by language scholarship or LDS doctrine? That is, are both equivalently plausible choices absent the influence of a particular doctrinal perspective, or does technical knowledge of the language lean one way rather than the other?
April 19, 2021 at 5:54 am
Any idea when the book is likely to be published?
January 31, 2022 at 11:26 pm
Do you believe adam and eve were rea people? And what about the fall? This is important to me. I know you probably have little time to spare but I would greatly appreciate any explanation you can give.
February 2, 2022 at 10:07 am
Sure, they were real people. But just about everything else is undetermined.
February 2, 2022 at 1:37 pm
Is Noah real? I always thought that it was a local flood but to say there’s no flood confuses me.
February 2, 2022 at 1:43 pm
How is everything else undetermined? Like what about Adam ondi ahman?